• Other than the Reporting Officer, there may be other staff members from the organisation that may be selected to assess the Assessee's performance.
  • The 360 Degree Peer Assessment is optional and may only be conducted, if required by the Reporting Officer.
  • The Reporting Officer can select staff members ('360 Degree Participants') to do the evaluation. Refer the Endorsement Phase for more information.
  • The 360 Degree Participant's assessment of the Assessee's performance is known as a 360 Degree Peer Assessment.
  • The 360 Degree Peer Assessment combines all responses from the '360 Degree Participants' to form an average of the Ratings.
  • '360 Degree Participants' must assess and rate the Assessee's performance against Competencies selected for the review period.
  • The '360 Degree Peer Assessment' can then be compared to the ratings obtained from the Self Assessment and the Reporting Officer's Assessment upon completion.


Checking Progress of 360 Degree Participants

The Reporting Officer can check the status of the 360 degree peer assessment.


To check the progress of the 360 Degree Peer Assessment(s), follow the steps below:

STEP 1: Go to the homepage, select an Assessment and open it.



STEP 2: In the Overview tab, click the '360 Status' icon to check the progress and see which 360 Degree Participants have completed their Assessment.



Completing the 360 Degree Assessment

To complete a 360 degree Assessment, follow the steps below:

STEP 1: Go to the 360 Invitations tab in the Homepage, navigate to your invitation and click the 'Assist' button to open the Assessment.



STEP 2: Provide a rating of 1 to 5 for each of the selected Competencies (with reference to the Rating Legend provided), to complete the '360' Peer Assessment.



Notes: 

  • Possible responses vary from 1 to 5, with 5 being "exceeded expectation" and 1 being "did not meet expectation".
  • The Ratings combined from all of the '360 Degree Participants' is the combined and used to calculate an average for each Rating representing the Assessee's performance. These averages can then be used to compare the Ratings obtained from the Assessee and Reporting Officer.